凤凰彩票_凤凰彩票

来源：凤凰彩票2024-02-08 17:48

凤凰彩票

李克强主持召开国务院党组会议******

李克强主持召开国务院党组会议

学习贯彻习近平总书记在二十届中央纪委二次全会上的重要讲话精神

持续推进政府系统全面从严治党

韩正出席

　　新华社北京1月11日电 1月10日，国务院总理、党组书记李克强主持召开国务院党组会议，学习贯彻习近平总书记在二十届中央纪委二次全会上的重要讲话精神，持续推进政府系统全面从严治党。

　　会议强调，要深入学习领会习近平总书记在中央纪委二次全会上的重要讲话精神，深刻领悟“两个确立”的决定性意义，增强“四个意识”、坚定“四个自信”、做到“两个维护”，坚持不懈推进全面从严治党、党风廉政建设和反腐败，贯穿于政府工作各方面、全过程，保障党的二十大决策部署贯彻落实。

　　一是全面从严治党要更好发挥政治引领和政治保障作用。国务院党组和各部门党组（党委）要始终在思想上政治上行动上同以习近平同志为核心的党中央保持高度一致，有力推动党中央决策部署贯彻落实。加强政治监督，在具体化、精准化、常态化上下更大功夫，确保党的理论和路线方针政策落实落地。

　　二是加强作风建设，狠抓中央八项规定落实。坚持政府过紧日子，勤俭办一切事情，打紧财政等国家资金铁算盘，从严控制非重点非刚性支出，更好节用裕民。继续纠治享乐主义、奢靡之风，坚决反对铺张浪费。坚持实事求是，遵循客观规律，把纠治形式主义、官僚主义摆在更加突出位置，坚决防止工作简单化“一刀切”、层层加码。

　　三是扎实履行全面从严治党主体责任。严负其责、严管所辖，带头自觉学习党章、遵守党章、贯彻党章、维护党章，自觉学习贯彻其他党内法规，增强纪律意识、规矩意识。深入推进党风廉政建设和反腐败。全面深化改革，持续推进“放管服”改革，严格规范公正文明执法，减少权力对微观经济活动的不当干预，不断铲除滋生腐败的土壤。聚焦审批监管、工程建设、公共资源交易等重点领域和民生重点事项，严肃查处腐败问题。

　　四是恪尽职守、担当作为。全面贯彻新发展理念，着力推动高质量发展，主动构建新发展格局，调动各方面积极性，结合实际创造性工作。解决好两难、多难问题，多做为民造福的实事。当前要继续抓好稳经济一揽子政策和接续措施落实，保持政策稳定性，大力推进改革开放，着力稳增长稳就业稳物价，保持经济运行在合理区间。抓实抓细重要民生商品、药品、能源等保供，做好困难人员救助帮扶、安全生产等工作。

　　会议指出，本届政府以来，国务院党组和各部门党组（党委）坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，认真落实全面加强党的领导的要求，充分发挥全面从严治党保障作用，与经济社会发展同部署同推进，坚持依法行政，持之以恒正风肃纪、从源头反腐，激励实干担当，政府系统全面从严治党和党风廉政建设持续推进。要健全政府系统全面从严治党体系，为推动经济社会发展提供坚强保障。

　　韩正、孙春兰、胡春华、刘鹤、魏凤和、王勇、王毅、肖捷、赵克志出席。

　　《光明日报》（ 2023年01月12日 03版）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.